<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Do Americans Really Feel About Taxes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crystalclearconservative.com/2009/04/23/how-do-americans-really-feel-about-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crystalclearconservative.com/2009/04/23/how-do-americans-really-feel-about-taxes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crystalclearconservative</title>
		<link>http://crystalclearconservative.com/2009/04/23/how-do-americans-really-feel-about-taxes/#comment-2295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crystalclearconservative]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crystalclearconservative.com/?p=2446#comment-2295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve,

I agree with you that the government has no right to our money, labor or wages.  The thing is the Federal government will need to obtain funds somewhere, because they are not going to cut back on spending or eliminate wasteful programs unless the &quot;Chosen One&quot; gets defeated by fiscal conservative in 2012 (preferably Mark Sanford or Jim DeMint).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>I agree with you that the government has no right to our money, labor or wages.  The thing is the Federal government will need to obtain funds somewhere, because they are not going to cut back on spending or eliminate wasteful programs unless the &#8220;Chosen One&#8221; gets defeated by fiscal conservative in 2012 (preferably Mark Sanford or Jim DeMint).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://crystalclearconservative.com/2009/04/23/how-do-americans-really-feel-about-taxes/#comment-2296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crystalclearconservative.com/?p=2446#comment-2296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Krystle,

While the fairtax has been proposed by many conservatives as being the solution to our tax problem, there are some problems with it that should be pointed out, and as such is why I believe we should oppose the Fair Tax.  With respects to author Lawrence Vance,

First,

The stated rate of the FairTax is too low to achieve the promised revenue neutrality. The amount by which it is claimed that prices would fall under a FairTax system has been grossly exaggerated. There is nothing to prevent an income tax from being reinstituted, giving us a two-headed hydra of an income tax and a consumption tax. And not only would state and local governments have to pay a national sales tax to the federal government, the federal government would have to pay sales taxes to itself on all its new purchases.

Second, the &quot;Fair Tax&quot; really isn&#039;t all that fair.

What&#039;s fair about a consumption tax? Why is it that people who rightly criticize the income tax are so quick to accept a national sales tax on consumption? The FairTax perpetuates the fallacy that the government has a right to confiscate a percentage of the value of each new good sold and every service rendered. This is no different than claiming that the government has a right to the portion of each American&#039;s income. As Murray Rothbard explained,

The consumption tax, on the other hand, can only be regarded as a payment for permission-to-live. It implies that a man will not be allowed to advance or even sustain his own life, unless he pays, off the top, a fee to the State for permission to do so. The consumption tax does not strike me, in its philosophical implications, as one whit more noble, or less presumptuous, than the income tax.

So Krystle it is important that we come at taxation from a very important mindset.  That the government has no &quot;right&quot; to our money, our labor, or our wages.  It is no different and no better to say that the government has no right to our income, but then somehow has a right to a percentage of each good and service that the free market handles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krystle,</p>
<p>While the fairtax has been proposed by many conservatives as being the solution to our tax problem, there are some problems with it that should be pointed out, and as such is why I believe we should oppose the Fair Tax.  With respects to author Lawrence Vance,</p>
<p>First,</p>
<p>The stated rate of the FairTax is too low to achieve the promised revenue neutrality. The amount by which it is claimed that prices would fall under a FairTax system has been grossly exaggerated. There is nothing to prevent an income tax from being reinstituted, giving us a two-headed hydra of an income tax and a consumption tax. And not only would state and local governments have to pay a national sales tax to the federal government, the federal government would have to pay sales taxes to itself on all its new purchases.</p>
<p>Second, the &#8220;Fair Tax&#8221; really isn&#8217;t all that fair.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s fair about a consumption tax? Why is it that people who rightly criticize the income tax are so quick to accept a national sales tax on consumption? The FairTax perpetuates the fallacy that the government has a right to confiscate a percentage of the value of each new good sold and every service rendered. This is no different than claiming that the government has a right to the portion of each American&#8217;s income. As Murray Rothbard explained,</p>
<p>The consumption tax, on the other hand, can only be regarded as a payment for permission-to-live. It implies that a man will not be allowed to advance or even sustain his own life, unless he pays, off the top, a fee to the State for permission to do so. The consumption tax does not strike me, in its philosophical implications, as one whit more noble, or less presumptuous, than the income tax.</p>
<p>So Krystle it is important that we come at taxation from a very important mindset.  That the government has no &#8220;right&#8221; to our money, our labor, or our wages.  It is no different and no better to say that the government has no right to our income, but then somehow has a right to a percentage of each good and service that the free market handles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

