Fimian Townhall Meeting

Tonight, I attended Keith Fimian’s townhall meeting on health care. Since I arrived a little later than I intended (thanks to traffic on I-66), Fimian’s townhall meeting filled almost the entire auditorium at the Fairfax County Government Center. Fimian’s meeting had a completely different theme compared to many townhall meetings. Since our Congressman Gerry Connolly did not want to face the public (other than those in gated retirement communities), Fimian wanted to inform everyone about what is included in this legislation by having three panelists, who are experts in health care.

Panelist #1 was Grace-Marie Turner of the Galen Institute, Panelist #2 was Jim Capretta of the Ethics & Policy Center, and Panelist #3 was Tom Miller of the American Enterprise Institute. Each panelist had the opportunity to deliver opening remarks. Most of the opening remarks centered around how the long-term costs from this health care plan. Basically, the proposed health care reform legislation will expand Medicaid to 133% of the poverty level and will cost the government $400 Billion over the course of a decade. The premium discount program would subsidize the insurance program, which would bring $1.2 Trillion in new spending, and this would result in tax increases. The taxpayers would be paying $500 Billion in taxes.

After the opening remarks, Fimian called people up for questions according to numbers. Below are some selected questions to the panelists:

Q:

Would the government have access to our tax records? Is this a fact or myth?

Panelist #3: This is partly true, as there is a provision in the House legislation that allows for the government to have access to your tax records.

Q:

How will FOCA (Freedom of Choice Act) be enacted in the health care legislation?

Panelist #1 explains FOCA, but mentions that Obama has pledged not to pursue it at first in his health care plan. Panelist #2 chimed in by saying that the House plan will include provisions that were introduced by Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio) that will cover abortion.

Q:

The man who asked this question has a brother, who has diabetes. His brother received an insulin pump a few years ago. He asked, “Would this pump have been invented and who would be eligible under Obama’s plan?”

Panelist #1 said that America rewards innovation. Under the Obama Administration, there would be a Comparative Effectiveness Council that will determine what treatments will be covered. Panelist #2 chimed in by saying that Americans want a health care system responsive to health challenges.

Overall, the meeting clarified some of Obama’s health care plan. Keith Fimian should be commended for holding a townhall meeting that was geared to inform from a free market perspective and was open to all within the 11th District.

Advertisement

About crystalclearconservative

Meet Crystal Clear Conservative, a blogger who grew up in Maryland, who now calls Northern Virginia home. I can be contacted at crystalclearblogger@gmail.com.

Posted on September 1, 2009, in Health Care, Virginia Politics and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. I also attended the forum and, after a couple of months trying to find my congressman (who is apparently in hiding), it was great to hear experts explain HR3200, and how it will radically transform our health care system. They went beyond explanation, to propose solutions for real reform ideas, based on free-market, “evidence based” proposals. What a concept, evidence based solutions! Fimian also mentioned that wellness care needs to be part of any health care reform. One solution mentioned was to pass a reform bill and roll it out in one state to test the system before we pass it for the whole country…it was suggested we start with Illinois…

  2. Wow! I made your blog! I am the one who asked the question about innovation (insulin pump) in a socialized, government monopolized system.

    Panelist #3 remarked that “if you like the health care you have now, hang onto it, because you won’t get anything better under any of the proposed plans.” (paraphrased)

    Also, at one point, #3 remarked, “In a free market system, providers are motivated to deliver quality care, whereas in the proposed system, providers will be most concerned about following government rules on what treatments they prescribe – with the risk of losing their license if they step out of bounds.”

    This would truly represent the destruction of the medical profession as we know it. Now I know what is meant by the “doctor-patient” relationship.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s