Feminists Resort to Radical Means for Gender Parity in the Sciences
Women have made gains in most academic areas except the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering & Math) fields. The lack of gender parity in these fields continues to confound most social engineers. Now, more radical measures are being employed to overcome the glass ceiling to tenure, a barrier jealously guarded by patriarchal holdouts. ABC news reports:
A woman opened fire today at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, killing three faculty members and injuring three other people, none of them students, officials said.
…
ABC News’ Huntsville, Ala., affiliate WAAY-TV reported that the suspect is a university biology professor whose tenure appeal was denied today, though authorities did not publicly confirm the report.
Who dares say that equating feminists to terrorists is over-the-top?
Posted on February 13, 2010, in Current Events, National Politics. Bookmark the permalink. 6 Comments.
This is sexist to the nth degree! You pig! How dare you demean women’s millennial struggle against male oppression with this over-the-top BS!
If the GOP wants to win elections it must triangulate between merit-based granting of tenure in the STEM fields with the urgent necessity of promoting women in these fields. The best measure would be to allow women to use calculators in the early grades, and prohibit boys from using them. That should make gains for parity while allowing males to gain positions based on merit. Another benefit will be a reduction of these incidents and less over-the-top posts equating feminism to terrorism.
200 Grande needs to be realistic and pragmatic and this is the way.
This is not over-the-top. Social engineering women to be like men exacerbates their propensity for materialism, spurring them to commit acts of terror, rendering them detrimental to the family.
Once again, we have new martyrs to the gun free campus policy.
Had one or more of the staff had access to their own weapons this screwball would have been killed on the spot and the lives of fellow staff and students would have been protected.
Academics need to use their research skills to discover what gun rights groups have been trying to tell them for years: Guns Save Lives! Had Ms Feminazi, known that she would likely face an armed response, she would have most likely decided NOT to try to shoot others.
Who shoots others over tenure decisions, anyway? Is this where we are today? Where every disappointment is amplified in weak minds into a motive for murder? I bet that Zoloft, Prozac or other mood drug played a role.
Everyone needn’t carry a weapon, but just having the crazies have to plan for the fact that a few people may be around who are armed and ready to shoot back, will deter most of these shooters, because they are really just cowards, anyway.
If you can earn a Concealed Carry Permit, then you should be able to carry a weapon on campus. I could even consider a college establishing a student/staff security team where members could earn the right to have a CCP and carry their weapons concealed on campus. I am willing to concede that guns should be left outside of bars, but that issue involves the private property of the bar owner.
What type of clueless person are you, JTB? Your response makes NO sense. Once again, these feminist haters are back to cause problems.
I have no problems with people owning guns. However, they have no place on a college or university campus.
Pingback: Auto Insurance – The Gender Advantage | Cheap Auto Insurance and Car Insurance Quotes Comparison