Blog Archives
The Palin Effect: A New Feminist Movement on the Right
With Sarah Palin’s rise to power over the past two years, there has been a rise in female Republican candidates seeking office, along with more females becoming active in political affairs. Could it be that we have a new feminist movement on the right?
According to a recent editorial by Dana Loesch in The Washington Examiner, the feminists are infuriated over Sarah Palin being considered a feminist. Ah, the notion of someone from the right being considered a feminist…wow, who would have thought that this would make the feminists angered. As Loesch discusses in her piece, feminism is no longer escaping patriarchy, rather it has become a movement that ties women to a political party, whose policies negatively impact women. This is the truth.
Loesch goes on to highlight many issues, where the liberal feminists have shown their hypocritical stripes, but it was her last comment that struck a chord:
Conservative women are active because the liberal idea of feminism has failed. An entire generation of berated men have been hog-tied by the chick card, and conservative women are tired of the liberal stereotype that they’re all simpletons who only raise their voices to sing in church.
Conservative women are rebelling against this false advocacy used as a political ploy to tether women to The Man.
Say hello to conservative feminism.
Conservative feminism actually stands up for working women and stay-at-home moms by advocating for common sense policies. This movement is not going away anytime soon and will continue to grow.
Adios Liberal Feminism…it’s been nice seeing how your radical views have detracted from the issues you championed over the years.
Feminism Rammed Down Victoria Boys' Throats
Continuing the role-reversing trend of women emulating their own worst caricatures of men, in Australia, the state of Victoria has decided to impose compulsory feminism programs in state schools:
Possible classroom activities include students acting out scenes of sexual coercion after which students would suggest more appropriate behaviour.
A VicHealth report for the state Education Department calls for teachers to be trained in gender, violence and sexual health issues so they would be comfortable discussing “taboo” issues.
With a goal of preventing violence against women, indoctrination is prescribed for all grades:
The report says programs for all students should start at primary level and be reinforced across all year levels in subjects including drama, English, science and sport.They would combat common attitudes among boys such as young women are either “good girls or sluts”, the report said.
By solely focusing on gender roles favoring men, while ignoring those favoring women, the report’s authors remark that
feminist theories were best at explaining the link between gender power relations and violence against women
yet, expressed surprise that “there was considerable community hostility to feminism, even among teachers and students” while maintaining
a feminist conceptual framework is essential both to reflect research on violence in relationships and families and to anchor the political commitments of the program
because it is “crucial that students were taught that sexist attitudes and unequal relationships between the sexes were central to explaining violence.” So, by eliminating all gender roles favoring men, while keeping those favoring women, violence against women will be eliminated? Got it?
It is amusing to note that Australian femimarxists tend to be a decade or so behind their KKK counterparts in the United States. Notice how the femimarxists always have violence on their minds. They obsess over it to the point of seeking to circumvent society’s institutions (in a futile attempt) to deny themselves of their deep, dark cravings.
With this insight, is it any wonder why a yarn like Twilight is an international phenomenon amongst women in the tween, teen and young adult categories? Just picture a man telling a woman to stay away from him because he is dangerous and, deep down, craves killing her. Why, he must be the love of her life. From that, she gets a feeling of security like she has never felt. From that, she knows that this man is the one, and that she must stay with him, since he will keep her safe. Could anyone make this up if it was not real?
Women are driven by their self-loathing and seek relief from it. Women seek protection from their own self-destructive nature by seeking discipline from the heavy hand of a strong man. With most modern men reduced to a herd of feminized, flip-flop wearing, soy-munching metrosexuals, women turn elsewhere–to the heavy hand of government, a husband and father substitute. Unfortunately, government is a poor substitute. By doing so, women have destroyed the patriarchy’s grand institutions by cowing men into said feminized, flip-flop wearing, soy-munching metrosexuals, thus denying themselves of the discipline they crave. Now, women of the west have been reduced to a herd of Haagen Dasz-guzzling brutes. Is there any wonder why Western Civilization is in peril?
Meat for the Ladies
Actually, it is the meat from the carcass of the red colobus monkey, as far as lady chimpanzees are concerned. Still, we could not pass up the opportunity to draw an analogy that we can all relate to.
Among chimpanzees, it is observed:
Females who are bolder or are more relaxed around males will approach the male who is in possession of meat and try to take a piece of meat or immediately start eating from the carcass
The male’s reaction varies, although the female’s reaction is probably typical, irregardless of species:
The male will either not react to this and allow the female to eat, or will pull the meat away from the female, to which females usually react by screaming, crying or throwing a temper tantrum
Now let’s see how the chimpanzees’ distant cousins play this same scenario in a typical DC area bar:
- 200 Grande: Hi.
- girl: Hi,….would you like to… like buy me a drink????
- 200 Grande: How ’bout you just have some of mine.
- girl: Okay….So what do you like do?
- 200 Grande: I’m a sustenance farmer. You?
- girl: No, come ‘on… really?
- 200 Grande: I’m actually a trial attorney specializing in gender discrimination suits.
- girl: Oh…my…God!!!! That is like so what I do! I like majored in women’s studies, and I like work for a nonprofit that like makes companies like hire more women!
- 200 Grande: Hey,…is that Megan Fox? I gotta go over there and talk to her. Bye.
- girl: Hey! You’re taking my drink!
- 200 Grande: It’s my drink. I didn’t buy you one, remember.
- girl: You can’t do this to me! I like went to the Ivy League!…and I like have a law degree,… you stupid POS!!!!
Besides an age-old truth, what is also revealed is how evolved human males screen out females that will not put out. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
